Ghost Sign Mapping Project Phase #1: Advertisements in Eastern San Francisco


375 Valencia571 Howard

Can an element of the urban environment be considered endangered? If so, are there categories, or heirarchies, of importance to be taken into account with this assessment? Is a neighborhood more important than a street than a building than an architectural element? And what about old signs and ads? Can an advertisement be considered of historic or sentimental significance? Can we detach the business/brand from the aesthetic of the ad from the context it’s shown in? Does that even matter?

Below is Phase #1 of my San Francisco Ghost Sign Mapping Project. In this phase, I’ve been meticulously walking the streets of eastern San Francisco documenting the old painted advertisements, or ghost signs, that I’ve come across. While ghost signs come in three generic categories – ads/brands, business/building signs, and illegible – I’ve focused on the first type for this map.


View Ads of San Francisco in a larger map

About my methodology: I walked up and down the streets of San Francisco, skipping the residential sections, and generally walking north/south streets some days and east/west streets on others. The signs I’ve included are either A) recognizable brands/companies or B) ads/billboards for businesses whom are NOT tenants in the buildings in question C) Any ad including an address or phone number. This is a work in progress and I’m sure I’ve missed many signs. Please let me know in the comments if you can think of any omissions I’ve made.

Larkin at Post1946 Van Ness